Part A. Author Policies for Articles
OpenMed Research is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical publishing in the medical and health life sciences. The following policies guide the submission, review, and publication of all articles.
Want To Submit Article 👇
1. Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that all submitted manuscripts are original works that have not been published previously, nor are they under review elsewhere. Any overlapping content, including prior preprints, conference abstracts, or datasets, should be clearly declared.
Plagiarism in any form—whether verbatim copying, paraphrasing without attribution, or reuse of previously published figures and tables without permission—is strictly prohibited. To safeguard integrity, all submissions undergo plagiarism detection checks. If significant overlap is detected, the authors will be contacted for clarification, revision, or withdrawal.
2. Authorship on Articles
OpenMed Research follows the ICMJE criteria for authorship. Only individuals who have made substantial intellectual contributions—such as conceptualizing the study, designing methodology, collecting or analyzing data, and drafting or critically revising the manuscript—should be listed as authors.
Guest authorship (adding someone who did not contribute), honorary authorship (adding someone for their status), and ghost authorship (excluding a contributor) are unethical and not allowed. Each author’s specific contribution must be transparently reported using the CRediT taxonomy (e.g., Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft, Data Curation).
Before submission, all authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for its content.
3. Competing Interests
Authors are required to fully disclose any financial or non-financial competing interests that could influence the interpretation of their work. Financial interests include employment, consultancy roles, stock ownership, honoraria, or research funding from commercial entities. Non-financial interests include personal or professional relationships, political or religious beliefs, or intellectual biases that may affect objectivity.
If there are no conflicts of interest, authors must include a statement confirming this. OpenMed Research publishes these disclosures alongside the article for full transparency.
4. Ethical Policies
4.1 Research Involving Humans
Manuscripts reporting studies involving human participants must include a statement confirming approval from an appropriate Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board (IRB). All participants should have provided informed consent, which must be documented in the manuscript. For vulnerable populations, special ethical considerations must be outlined.
Any identifying information about patients or participants must be removed unless explicit written consent for publication has been obtained.
4.2 Research Involving Animals
Animal studies must comply with internationally recognized guidelines for animal welfare, such as the ARRIVE guidelines. Authors must include details of the ethical approval obtained, housing and care conditions, and efforts made to minimize suffering.
4.3 Research Involving Plants
For studies involving collection or experimentation with plant species—especially rare, endangered, or protected varieties—authors must demonstrate compliance with national and international biodiversity regulations (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity). Any required collection permits must be documented.
5. Registration of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews
5.1 Trial Registration
All clinical trials must be registered in a publicly accessible registry (such as ClinicalTrials.gov or WHO ICTRP) before the enrollment of participants. The registration number should be clearly stated in both the abstract and methods section of the article.
5.2 Systematic Review Registration
To promote transparency and prevent duplication, systematic reviews should be registered in PROSPERO or an equivalent registry before data extraction begins. The registration number should be included in the methods section.
6. Standards of Reporting
To ensure clarity and reproducibility, authors must follow appropriate reporting guidelines relevant to their study design. For example:
- CONSORT for randomized controlled trials
Â
- PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Â
- CARE for case reports
Â
- STROBE for observational studies
Â
Checklists from these guidelines may be requested during submission.
7. Licenses and Copyright
Articles published with OpenMed Research are fully open access and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This license allows others to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided the original authors and source are appropriately credited.
Authors retain full copyright of their work. If third-party material (e.g., previously published figures or images) is used, authors are responsible for obtaining necessary permissions.
8. Permanency of Content
Once published, articles remain permanently accessible on the OpenMed Research platform. However, in some cases, updates or changes may be necessary:
- Corrections: If minor errors are identified that do not affect the validity of the study, an official correction notice will be published and linked to the original article.
Â
- Retractions: If significant errors, ethical breaches, or misconduct are discovered, the article may be retracted with a clear explanation.
Â
- Removals: Content may only be removed under exceptional circumstances, such as legal obligations, privacy concerns, or defamatory material.
Â
All updates maintain version transparency, ensuring that previous versions remain accessible with proper annotation.
9. Allegations of Misconduct
Any allegations of plagiarism, data fabrication, unethical research, or duplicate publication will be investigated in accordance with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. Authors will have an opportunity to respond before any action is taken. Confirmed misconduct will lead to a correction, retraction, or removal as appropriate.
10. Appeals and Complaints
Authors may appeal editorial decisions if they believe the process was unfair or a misunderstanding occurred. Appeals must include a clear justification with supporting evidence.
Complaints about peer review, editorial handling, or publishing policies can be submitted to info@openmedresearch.com. All complaints are reviewed by an independent Ethics and Integrity Panel.
OpenMed Research follows the ICMJE criteria for authorship. Only individuals who have made substantial intellectual contributions—such as conceptualizing the study, designing methodology, collecting or analyzing data, and drafting or critically revising the manuscript—should be listed as authors.
Guest authorship (adding someone who did not contribute), honorary authorship (adding someone for their status), and ghost authorship (excluding a contributor) are unethical and not allowed. Each author’s specific contribution must be transparently reported using the CRediT taxonomy (e.g., Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft, Data Curation).
Before submission, all authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for its content.
Authors are required to fully disclose any financial or non-financial competing interests that could influence the interpretation of their work. Financial interests include employment, consultancy roles, stock ownership, honoraria, or research funding from commercial entities. Non-financial interests include personal or professional relationships, political or religious beliefs, or intellectual biases that may affect objectivity.
If there are no conflicts of interest, authors must include a statement confirming this. OpenMed Research publishes these disclosures alongside the article for full transparency.
Part B. Author Policies for Posters, Slide Presentations, and Blogs
OpenMed Research also provides a platform for visual and informal scientific content, including conference posters, slide decks, infographics, and educational blog posts. While these formats are less formal than journal articles, the same principles of integrity and transparency apply.
1. Content Authenticity
All posters, slides, and blogs must be original work created by the submitting author(s). If the material summarizes previously published research or includes external data, proper attribution and citations must be provided.
We discourage direct copying of previously published visual materials unless they are openly licensed (e.g., CC BY) and properly credited.
2. Authorship and Credit
The presenting or submitting author is responsible for ensuring that all contributors are appropriately credited. For group projects or collaborative posters, co-authors or team members must be listed, and their roles acknowledged.
Authorship misrepresentation—such as omitting major contributors or adding individuals who made no meaningful contribution—is not allowed.
3. Competing Interests
Just as with articles, any financial sponsorship, institutional support, or personal interests relevant to the presented content must be disclosed. If no conflicts exist, a no competing interests statement should be included at the end of the material.
4. Ethical Considerations in Visual Content
- Human Data: If a poster or slide deck includes identifiable images of patients or research participants, authors must obtain explicit written consent for public sharing.
- Animal or Plant Data: Visual content derived from animal or plant research must also mention the ethical approvals obtained for the original study.
5. Transparency for Trial and Review Summaries
- Posters summarizing clinical trials must include the trial registration number prominently.
- Blog posts or slides summarizing systematic reviews should reference their PROSPERO registration (if applicable) and link to the main study.
6. Reporting Standards for Visual Formats
Visual content must be accurate, clear, and free from misleading statements. Overstating findings, cherry-picking data, or omitting key limitations is considered unethical.
For educational blog posts, sources should be cited, and claims supported by evidence-based references.
7. Licensing and Sharing Policy
All posters, slides, and blog posts are shared under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, allowing reuse with appropriate credit. Authors are responsible for ensuring third-party images, icons, or charts comply with copyright and licensing requirements.
8. Content Permanence
- Updates: Authors may upload updated versions of posters or slides to correct errors or enhance clarity.
- Withdrawals/Removals: Content may be removed if found to contain false information, violate ethical guidelines, or breach copyright.
Each version or update will maintain a transparent history so readers can track changes over time.
9. Handling Misconduct in Visual Content
Plagiarism, falsified data, or copyright infringement in posters, slides, or blogs will trigger an investigation. Confirmed misconduct may lead to content removal and a public explanation of the reason.
10. Comments and Discussions
Viewers can leave constructive comments or questions on posters, slides, and blogs. All comments are moderated to ensure they remain professional and respectful.
- Offensive, defamatory, or spam comments will be removed.
- Authors are encouraged to engage with constructive feedback.
11. Appeals and Concerns
If an author disagrees with a moderation decision, content withdrawal, or comment removal, they may submit an appeal to the OpenMed Research editorial team. Appeals are reviewed by the Content Integrity Team to ensure fairness.
These policies ensure that whether you’re sharing a peer-reviewed article or a visual presentation, OpenMed Research maintains the same high ethical and transparency standards.